Add Row
Add Element

Add Element
Moss Point Gulf Coast Tech
update

Gulf Coast Tech

update
Add Element
  • Home
  • About
  • Categories
    • Tech News
    • Trending News
    • Tomorrow Tech
    • Disruption
    • Case Study
    • Infographic
    • Insurance
    • Shipbuilding
    • Technology
    • Final Expense
    • Expert Interview
    • Expert Comment
    • Shipyard Employee
  • Mississippio
March 24.2025
3 Minutes Read

Why 70% of Media Companies Are Not Fully Using AI Yet

Illustration of people carrying AI chip, Media Companies Not Fully Using AI.

AI in Media: Where Do We Stand?

A recent report from the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) reveals that a staggering 70% of media companies are not fully utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) despite recognizing its potential. As industries grapple with the complexities of AI integration, understanding both its hesitations and successes is crucial for navigating the future of media campaigns.

Current Adoption Landscape

According to the IAB report, which surveyed over 500 industry professionals, only 30% of companies have integrated AI into their media efforts. Notably, agencies and publishers are leading the charge with 37% and 34% implementation rates, respectively, while only 19% of brands have embraced AI at this level. This discrepancy highlights an opportunity for brands to catch up before the expected surge of full implementations by 2026, as half of the surveyed companies plan to adopt AI in their campaigns.

Positive Perceptions of AI

Despite the slow adoption rate, those currently leveraging AI report positive outcomes. An impressive 82% of users stated that AI meets or exceeds their efficiency expectations, with 75% acknowledging its effectiveness in enhancing media campaigns. The ability of AI to handle data-heavy tasks like audience segmentation signifies a powerful advantage for organizations willing to adopt this technology.

Challenges to Full Integration

While the benefits of AI are clear, several barriers hinder its widespread adoption. The IAB report identified that 62% of companies are concerned about the complexity of AI implementation, along with fears surrounding data security and a general lack of understanding about AI technologies. Interestingly, concerns about job displacement are not seen as a significant issue, underscoring a different perspective on the impact of AI in the workforce.

Unique Challenges for Publishers and Brands

Within the landscape, different stakeholders face distinct challenges. Publishers encounter technology complexity and scattered capabilities, while brands often suffer from an unclear vision for AI integration. Meanwhile, agencies deal with resistance to change among team members and clients, which can stymie progress. With 51% of brands expressing concerns about transparency when working with AI, establishing trust is vital for fruitful partnerships.

Looking Toward the Future of Technology

As we look ahead, the report suggests that companies without a solid AI strategy risk falling behind. By 2026, the competitive landscape will likely shift as organizations that prioritize training and data governance will position themselves favorably. Embracing AI entails not just technological implementation but also a cultural shift that promotes adaptability to meet emerging tech trends.

The Essential Role of Training and Governance

To navigate this transformation successfully, companies must invest in training their teams and setting precise goals. This can prevent pitfalls associated with AI uncertainty and ensure that all stakeholders are on the same page. The IAB report underscores the need for organizations to establish clear guidelines around data privacy and transparency to foster trust and drive results effectively.

The evolving use of AI within media campaigns could reshape industry dynamics dramatically, making it more imperative than ever for companies to embrace these innovative technologies. Companies willing to engage actively with AI stand to gain a competitive advantage as the landscape continues to transform.

Disruption

0 Comments

Write A Comment

*
*
Related Posts All Posts
02.24.2026

SerpApi vs. Google: The Legal Fight Over SERP Scraping Explained

Update Understanding the Legal Battle Over SERP Scraping The tech world is currently watching a heated legal battle between SerpApi and Google regarding the legality of search engine result page (SERP) scraping. At the heart of this dispute is SerpApi's recent motion to dismiss Google's lawsuit, which accuses the web scraping tool of unlawfully accessing search results and violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA). This case could set significant precedents for how third-party applications interact with search engines, opening a larger dialogue about copyright, content ownership, and access rights in the era of digital information. What’s at Stake for Both Companies? SerpApi argues that Google lacks the standing to sue under copyright law because the content displayed in search results belongs to publishers, not Google itself. According to SerpApi CEO Julien Khaleghy, the law protects copyright holders, who are the creators of the content, not the platforms that merely display it. This perspective challenges Google's assertion that it has exclusive rights over the search results it presents, which include licensed images and user-generated content, thus asserting that the implications of this case could extend well beyond just one company. The Counterargument: Is Google Scraping Too? In its defense, SerpApi claims it is acting similarly to Google by utilizing automated means to scrape public websites and synthesize this data for its clients. This mirrors Google’s own methodology—using information from various sites to provide search results. As noted in a report from The Verge, SerpApi posits that Google, as the largest scraper on the planet, should not be able to enforce stricter rules against smaller operations like itself while essentially engaging in the same activities on a different scale. This raises critical questions about the rights of tech companies operating in the digital space and who actually owns the data. Legal Precedents and Future Implications The outcome of this case could reshape how digital content is shared and scraped across the internet. Previous rulings, including the Supreme Court decision in Lexmark International v. Static Control Components, established that injuries must fall within the legal protections aimed at preventing unauthorized uses. SerpApi’s legal strategy hinges upon demonstrating that Google’s grievances do not align with the intended applications of the DMCA, casting a spotlight on whether laws designed to protect creative works can effectively regulate technology-driven data usage practices. Looking Ahead: The Hearing’s Significance The forthcoming hearing, scheduled for May 19, 2026, will not only determine the fate of SerpApi but may also set a legal framework for how companies can monitor and manage their content against automated access. If Google's theory is upheld, it could enable similar companies to restrict public access to data, potentially stifling innovation and competition among tech disruptors, and impacting the future of technology as a whole. As this legal battle unfolds, stakeholders in the tech and publishing industries will be anxiously awaiting the court's decision. For many, it’s not just about a single service, but the foundational principles of content ownership, copyright enforcement, and the future landscape of digital technology.

02.24.2026

How Google's Latest Discover Core Update Impacts Local Content Visibility

Update Understanding the Google Discover Core Update Google has rolled out another core update that significantly affects its Discover feature, particularly for English-language users across the United States. This February 2026 update prioritizes local content, reducing clickbait, and emphasizing deep expertise on specific topics. These shifts are critical for content creators and anyone involved in digital marketing, as they directly influence how audiences access information on Google’s platform. Impacts on Local Content Distribution One of the most notable changes in the Discover core update is the increased visibility of local content. As early analysis from NewzDash indicates, local domains in California and New York observed a significant uptick in their visibility. For example, local articles from California surged from 10 to 16 in the top 100 placements after the update. This kind of change highlights Google's commitment to enhancing regional relevance, ensuring users receive news that resonates with their local communities. This approach is particularly advantageous for regional news outlets aiming to connect with specific audiences. Reducing Clickbait for Better Engagement Another major goal of the update is to minimize sensationalism in Discover feeds. Google seeks to reward genuine content that delivers what it promises, further encouraging content creators to abandon misleading headlines. The NewzDash report tracked a drop in the presence of clickbait-style titles across various domains, despite challenges in definitively measuring this through headline markers alone. As publishers focus on creating qualitative content that genuinely informs users, they may find this translated into better audience engagement over time. Revised Publisher Landscape What's fascinating is that while the Discover update has expanded the variety of topics available, it has simultaneously narrowed the distribution to fewer publishers. Data showed a decline in unique domains featured in Discover's rankings—from 172 to 158 in the US—indicating a shift towards a smaller pool of content creators that deliver specialized knowledge. As Infintech Designs explains, it becomes crucial for agencies and publishers to carve out distinct niches instead of attempting broader coverage. This nuanced focus not only aligns with Google's new objectives but also fosters a more engaged audience, as users seek specific and authoritative insights. What Should Publishers Do? To align with Google’s renewed focus, content publishers need to adapt significantly by enhancing local relevance, refining their approach to headlines, and demonstrating topic expertise. Here are a few actionable strategies: Double Down on Local Content: Create and share content tailored to the interests and needs of local audiences, such as covering community events and local news updates. Eliminate Clickbait: Focus on writing headlines that accurately reflect the content. Aim for clarity over intrigue to foster trust and credibility. Cultivate Expertise: Develop a strong understanding of your topics, particularly if covering multiple subjects. Ensure content is in-depth and continuously refined to maintain relevance, demonstrating genuine expertise. Looking Ahead to Future Changes Google is expected to expand this Discover update’s focus beyond the US English-speaking audience, pushing content publishers to adapt quickly. With continuous changes in the digital landscape, staying ahead of tech news and understanding evolving algorithms will be key for content visibility and engagement in 2025 and beyond. In summary, the February 2026 Discover core update emphasizes local relevance and quality content over sensationalism, bringing forth a new era of digital strategy for content creators and marketers. Staying abreast of these changes and implementing tactical adjustments will empower publishers to enhance their connection with audiences effectively.

02.21.2026

Unlocking Insights: Google Ads Performance Max Placement Reports Now Show Search Partner Domains

Update Understanding the Recent Changes in Google Ads Performance Max In a move that caught the attention of many digital marketers, Google Ads has begun to populate its Performance Max (PMax) placement reports with valuable data. Advertisers can now see the specific domains where their ads are displayed, alongside impression counts—a feature that many have been eagerly awaiting since the campaign type was launched. This new addition not only clarifies the performance landscape for advertisers but also enhances brand safety oversight. What the Performance Max Placement Report Brings The refreshed Performance Max placement report includes individual domains, network types, and detailed impression counts. Marketer Thomas Eccel took to LinkedIn to express his delight over these changes, emphasizing how it eliminates the ambiguity surrounding who Google’s Search Partners truly are. Prior to this update, many advertisers were frustrated to find a virtually empty report when they sought clarity on their PMax ad placements. A Shift in Reporting: From Grey Zones to Clarity Historically, advertisers have struggled with the vague reporting surrounding Google’s Search Partner Network. With this update, the reporting now serves dual roles: it remains a brand safety tool while also providing critical insights into ad placements. However, it’s essential to note that advertisers still cannot access detailed performance metrics such as clicks or conversions directly linked to individual placements. This limitation means that while advertisers can see where their impressions are coming from, tying revenue directly back to those placements remains impossible. What Remains Unchanged: Limitations of the Report While the performance data is a welcome addition, Google has clarified that the placement report should not be used to gauge overall campaign performance. Instead, it is designed primarily for brand safety review, helping advertisers decide where they might want to restrict ad deployment. This distinction is vital, especially for those who might assume that the report could facilitate optimization strategies based on directly measurable performance. The Road Ahead: Future Transparency in PMax Reporting Though no formal announcements have confirmed additional data layers, users are cautiously optimistic about what the future may hold. The introduction of placement-level data suggests a progression towards more granular analytics, consistent with Google's past advancements in PMax reporting. However, until there is clarity from Google about the potential for incorporating click and conversion data, marketers will need to adapt their strategies to work with the current confines of the reporting tools. The Importance of Brand Safety in Advertising This update underscores the significance of brand safety in the digital advertising arena. Knowing where your ads are displayed ensures that brands protect their image while ensuring their budgets are allocated efficiently. For many businesses, understanding the landscape of ad placements has turned into not just a preference but a necessity in today’s competitive digital marketing environment. Conclusion: Embracing the Changes in Google Ads The recent enhancements in the Google Ads Performance Max placement report are a significant step towards greater transparency in digital advertising. While the report may not provide all the desired performance metrics, it opens the door to better decision-making for advertisers. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, staying informed of these changes will be crucial for any market participant.

Terms of Service

Privacy Policy

Core Modal Title

Sorry, no results found

You Might Find These Articles Interesting

T
Please Check Your Email
We Will Be Following Up Shortly
*
*
*